Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
Site feedback:Take our SurveyNew Window，详情可参考safew官方下载
另一方面，吴德沛把更多精力投入到调研。去年全国两会前，他围绕创新药可及性展开系统调研，走访医疗机构、药企和保险机构，与国家医保局、国家卫生健康委、金融监管部门等多方交流，梳理创新药从研发到支付的堵点。“单靠基本医保，很难承载高值创新药支付需求，必须让商业保险参与进来。”围绕这一目标，吴德沛反复完善建议，提出建立“基本医保+商业保险+社会救助”的衔接机制，推动编制商业健康保险创新药品目录，多次参与专题座谈并持续跟踪政策进展。吴德沛说：“履职不是提完建议就结束，而是要持续跟进。”。业内人士推荐WPS官方版本下载作为进阶阅读
.claude.json 配置内容：